I’ve been an active member of Esperanto-USA for many years, even serving on its board of directors. I wanted to help build a strong, healthy national organization that effectively promotes Esperanto in the United States. But when I stepped down from the board, that desire didn’t end. I continued to bring problems to the attention of the organization, ranging from member rights to strategy to proper governance. I’ve decided to be public about this latest issue because of its seriousness and because of how the board has been secretive about it. The membership deserves to know what is done in their name. What Happened In November 2025, the board of Esperanto-USA sent a formal letter to Esperanto-Ligo en Israelo (ELI) with a copy to UEA, concerning an article published in ELI’s bulletin. The article, written by Eduardo Topol, contained inflammatory political content. And although I agree that the article was extremely offensive, the board’s decision to inj...
Some thoughts that have been living rent-free recently in my head about AI... We should be more precise when we talk about it. We’ve had "AI" for decades. Google Translate, Alexa and Siri, computer vision in video games, OCR in mail sorting, protein folding models all fall under artificial intelligence, but there’s no mass panic over these. The current progress is in generative AI, and that's where most of the public concern is. I’m guilty of the shorthand myself, saying "AI" when I mean "generative AI". People are afraid of generative AI, but the real problem is concentrated power and corporate greed. Someone wanting to sow disinformation could do so without generative AI models, and deep-pocket organizations of state could finance extreme actors if they wanted to. The tools evolved, but the risks aren’t new. The bigger problem that few are talking about is corporations who are aligning the technology for their own goals; they increasingly dicta...