Skip to main content

Top-10 PHP String Functions

By day I work as a programmer at ShoreGroup, Inc. By night I'm a freelance developer and now the managing editor for SitePoint's latest site, PHPMaster.com. Helping out with the site has been pretty fun so far; my Australian counterparts are all pretty cool, and I've met some really great new authors too. If you haven't visited yet, take a moment and check out PHPMaster.com (there's still some wrinkles to iron out on the site, but we're working to identify and fix them all as soon as we can).

Part of my duties as a managing editor include working with authors to make sure the site's content is well balanced. PHPMaster.com is targeting PHP programmers of all skill levels, so there should be a good mix of basic, beginner, intermediate, and advanced content. Planning for a beginner article that demonstrates basic string handling functions, I wondered which function to highlight. I wanted to show ones that would be most relevant, not necessarily ones that were my favorite, so I decided to do some static analysis of popular open-source projects to find out which string functions were used the most. The results were surprising, so I thought I'd share my "research."

I used the source of a closed-source PHP project that I have access to and the following open-source (or open-source-ish) projects as code samples for the analysis:

Then I ran the following PHP to tally the functions:

#! /usr/bin/env php
<?php
if ($_SERVER["argc"] != 4) {
    $script = basename(__FILE__);
    fprintf(STDERR, "usage: %s directory max exts\n", $script);
    fprintf(STDERR, "\tdirectory - directory to start traversal\n");
    fprintf(STDERR, "\tmax - maximum number of results to return\n");
    fprintf(STDERR, "\texts - comma-separated list of file extensions\n");
    fprintf(STDERR, "example: %s /var/www 20 php,inc\n", $script);
    exit(1);
}
// no error-checking... don't be stupid
$directory = $_SERVER["argv"][1];
$max = $_SERVER["argv"][2];
$extsRegex = "/(" . str_replace(",", "|", $_SERVER["argv"][3]) . ')$/';

$dirIter = new RecursiveDirectoryIterator($directory);
$recIter = new RecursiveIteratorIterator($dirIter);
$iter = new RegexIterator($recIter, $extsRegex);

$funcs = array();
foreach ($iter as $file) {
    $tokens = token_get_all(file_get_contents($file));
    foreach ($tokens as $t) {
        if (is_array($t) && $t[0] == T_STRING && function_exists($t[1])) {
            if (!isset($funcs[$t[1]])) {
                $funcs[$t[1]] = 0;
            }
            $funcs[$t[1]]++;
        }
    }
}
arsort($funcs);

$max = min(count($funcs), $max);
if ($max) {
    list($funcs) = array_chunk($funcs, $max, true);
}
print_r($funcs);

I took the resulting list of functions and extracted the string-specific ones to come up with this top-10 list (sorted in decreasing order of most-used):

  1. substr() - 6,605
  2. sprintf() - 5,604
  3. implode()/join() - 4,829
  4. strlen() - 4,557
  5. chr() - 4,122
  6. str_replace() - 4,009
  7. explode() - 3,401
  8. strpos() - 3,238
  9. htmlspecialchars() - 3,171
  10. trim() - 2,998

I expected functions like substr() and trim() to be on the list, but chr() was a surprise. Before this I probably would have laughed at you if you told me chr() is used almost twice as much as strtolower() (which came in 12th place with 2,267). Interesting results indeed!

Comments

  1. These strings are really helpful for PHP developers and thanks a lot for sharing them with us.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Writing a Minimal PSR-0 Autoloader

An excellent overview of autoloading in PHP and the PSR-0 standard was written by Hari K T over at PHPMaster.com , and it's definitely worth the read. But maybe you don't like some of the bloated, heavier autoloader offerings provided by various PHP frameworks, or maybe you just like to roll your own solutions. Is it possible to roll your own minimal loader and still be compliant? First, let's look at what PSR-0 mandates, taken directly from the standards document on GitHub : A fully-qualified namespace and class must have the following structure \<Vendor Name>\(<Namespace>\)*<Class Name> Each namespace must have a top-level namespace ("Vendor Name"). Each namespace can have as many sub-namespaces as it wishes. Each namespace separator is converted to a DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR when loading from the file system. Each "_" character in the CLASS NAME is converted to a DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR . The "_" character has no special ...

What's Wrong with OOP

Proponents of Object Oriented Programming feel the paradigm yields code that is better organized, easier to understand and maintain, and reusable. They view procedural programming code as unwieldy spaghetti and embrace OO-centric design patterns as the "right way" to do things. They argue objects are easier to grasp because they model how we view the world. If the popularity of languages like Java and C# is any indication, they may be right. But after almost 20 years of OOP in the mainstream, there's still a large portion of programmers who resist it. If objects truly model the way people think of things in the real world, then why do people have a hard time understanding and working in OOP? I suspect the problem might be the focus on objects instead of actions. If I may quote from Steve Yegge's Execution in the Kingdom of Nouns : Verbs in Javaland are responsible for all the work, but as they are held in contempt by all, no Verb is ever permitted to wander about ...

Learning Prolog

I'm not quite sure exactly I was searching for, but somehow I serendipitously stumbled upon the site learnprolognow.org a few months ago. It's the home for an introductory Prolog programming course. Logic programming offers an interesting way to think about your problems; I've been doing so much procedural and object-oriented programming in the past decade that it really took effort to think at a higher level! I found the most interesting features to be definite clause grammars (DCG), and unification. Difference lists are very powerful and Prolog's DCG syntax makes it easy to work with them. Specifying a grammar such as: s(s(NP,VP)) --> np(NP,X,Y,subject), vp(VP,X,Y). np(np(DET,NBAR,PP),X,Y,_) --> det(DET,X), nbar(NBAR,X,Y), pp(PP). np(np(DET,NBAR),X,Y,_) --> det(DET,X), nbar(NBAR,X,Y). np(np(PRO),X,Y,Z) --> pro(PRO,X,Y,Z). vp(vp(V),X,Y) --> v(V,X,Y). vp(vp(V,NP),X,Y) --> v(V,X,Y), np(NP,_,_,object). nbar(nbar(JP),X,3) --> jp(JP,X). pp(pp(PREP,N...