Skip to main content

Please God, Give Me Something New!

"Here... check out this (link). But you have to use the most recent version of Chrome." Sigh. Haven't we been through this already? 15 years have passed and we're headed right back to the same place we started... "Best viewed in <someone's favorite browser>." It's sad, really.

Don't get me wrong. Years of standardization work on HTML, JavaScript, the DOM, CSS, etc. cleaned up a lot of messy lose ends and yes it was indeed necessary, but stringent standardization also stifles creativity. And now that HTML5 and friends have loosened some of the restrictions the pendulum has started to swing back in the opposite direction. People have started to innovate again. This time around it's Firefox vs Chrome instead of Internet Explorer vs Netscape.

There's a systemic problem that goes beyond browser wars, however. Remember AOL? This time it's Facebook trying to be “The Internet.” Remember mainframes and terminals? After pushing everything to the desktop, now we're pushing everything back “to the cloud.” All the fourth and fifth generation programming languages have come and gone and the best we have now is Java and Clojure?! Remember Ajax, er I mean DHTML, er I mean JavaScript? We're all "innovating" but nobody is really doing anything new, exciting, and unique.

Hell, Tesla plugged 200 light bulbs into the ground and lit them up 25-miles away from a power source in 1899 and the best we have now is Solyndra and the Prius? What gives?!

The sine-like cycle of technological advancements wouldn't be bad if each cycle actually gave us something new; you know, an advancement. Maybe that's what has me so jaded. Each cycle seems to rehash the previous cycle and there's nothing really new and exciting anymore. We're moving in circles, not traveling in spirals. The more things change, the more they stay the same. Is Quindlen right, and every story has already been told?

Think about HTML5's canvas element which everyone is saying how great and wonderful it is, an area for 2D drawing that can be manipulated with JavaScript. If browsers had actually implemented decent support for SVG 10 years ago we wouldn't need canvas now. That's right, we've had this “hot new technology” for 10 years already. And sadly, SVG is superior in many ways. And sadly, we've had 3D capability with VRML/X3D since the mid-90s. And sadly, we've settled for something less and are grinning from ear to ear.

Wouldn't you like to have technology from 10 years into the future? It sounds tempting, but I'm not so sure I really would... because it'd probably be the same as what I've already had for the past 10 years just with a new marketing campaign.

Esperanto translation is available at Dio, Iun Novan Bonvolu Doni al Mi!


  1. Perhaps some of the re-branding is required because the powers that be are too conservative to accept the "new" features and technologies and re-branding allows people to sell the same old crap in a new box specially tailored for the conservative.

  2. Well maybe they should come up with a better marketing campaign the first-time around then! :-P


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Composing Music with PHP

I’m not an expert on probability theory, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. And even my Music 201 class from years ago has been long forgotten. But if you’ll indulge me for the next 10 minutes, I think you’ll find that even just a little knowledge can yield impressive results if creatively woven together. I’d like to share with you how to teach PHP to compose music. Here’s an example: You’re looking at a melody generated by PHP. It’s not the most memorable, but it’s not unpleasant either. And surprisingly, the code to generate such sequences is rather brief. So what’s going on? The script calculates a probability map of melodic intervals and applies a Markov process to generate a new sequence. In friendlier terms, musical data is analyzed by a script to learn which intervals make up pleasing melodies. It then creates a new composition by selecting pitches based on the possibilities it’s observed. . Standing on ShouldersComposition doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Bach was f…

Creepy JavaScript Tracking

I recently began allergy shots so my new Monday morning routine includes me sitting in a doctor's office for 30 minutes (I must wait after receiving the shots and be checked by a nurse to make sure there was no reaction). With nothing else better to do while I waited last week, I started playing around with some JavaScript. This is what I came up with:
<html> <head> <title>Test</title> <script type="text/javascript"> window.onload = function () { var mX = 0,  mY = 0, sX = 0,  sY = 0, queue = [], interval = 200, recIntv = null, playIntv = null, b = document.body, de = document.documentElement, cursor = document.getElementById("cursor"), record = document.getElementById("record"), play = document.getElementById("play"); window.onmousemove = function (e) { e = e || window.event; if (e.pageX || e.pageY) { …

Geolocation Search

Services that allow users to identify nearby points of interest continue to grow in popularity. I'm sure we're all familiar with social websites that let you search for the profiles of people near a postal code, or mobile applications that use geolocation to identify Thai restaurants within walking distance. It's surprisingly simple to implement such functionality, and in this post I will discuss how to do so.

The first step is to obtain the latitude and longitude coordinates of any locations you want to make searchable. In the restaurant scenario, you'd want the latitude and longitude of each eatery. In the social website scenario, you'd want to obtain a list of postal codes with their centroid latitude and longitude.

In general, postal code-based geolocation is a bad idea; their boundaries rarely form simple polygons, the area they cover vary in size, and are subject to change based on the whims of the postal service. But many times we find ourselves stuck on a c…