Skip to main content

Generating C Code and Compiling from STDIN

Lately I've been exploring some syslog configurations and needed to generate some log messages to verify they were routed correctly. Of course doing so programmatically would provide an easy and repeatable method to generate a batch of fresh log messages whenever I needed, but because of the number of facilities and priorities defined by the syslog protocol, it made sense to write a code generator to iterate the different permutations.

The following Lua script generates boilerplate C code for each of the 64 messages needed to test LOG_LOCAL 0-7 with all priorities. I chose generating the code in this manner over writing a nested facilities/priorities loop directly in C so I could easily include a textual representation of the facility and priority constants in the log message (this seemed like a cleaner solution to me than having to maintain a mapping of constants to char* strings as well). And why Lua? Well, it seemed a better idea than M4. :)

#! /usr/bin/env lua

local facilities = {
    "LOG_LOCAL0",
    "LOG_LOCAL1",
    "LOG_LOCAL2",
    "LOG_LOCAL3",
    "LOG_LOCAL4",
    "LOG_LOCAL5",
    "LOG_LOCAL6",
    "LOG_LOCAL7"
}

local priorities = {
    "LOG_DEBUG",
    "LOG_INFO",
    "LOG_NOTICE",
    "LOG_WARNING",
    "LOG_ERR",
    "LOG_CRIT",
    "LOG_ALERT",
    "LOG_EMERG"
}

print([[
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <syslog.h>
#include <libgen.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    char *appName = basename(argv[0]);
]])

for _, facility in pairs(facilities) do 
    for _, priority in pairs(priorities) do
        print(string.format(
[[
    openlog(appName, LOG_CONS|LOG_NDELAY|LOG_PID, %s);
    syslog(%s, "Test %s.%s message.\n");
    closelog();
]],
            facility, priority, facility, priority
        ))
    end
end

print([[
    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}]])

Running the script will output the desired C code, which looks like this:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <syslog.h>
#include <libgen.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    char *appName = basename(argv[0]);

    openlog(appName, LOG_CONS|LOG_NDELAY|LOG_PID, LOG_LOCAL0);
    syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Test LOG_DEBUG message.\n");
    closelog();

    openlog(appName, LOG_CONS|LOG_NDELAY|LOG_PID, LOG_LOCAL0);
    syslog(LOG_INFO, "Test LOG_INFO message.\n");
    closelog();

    openlog(appName, LOG_CONS|LOG_NDELAY|LOG_PID, LOG_LOCAL0);
    syslog(LOG_NOTICE, "Test LOG_NOTICE message.\n");
    closelog();
...

If I wanted to inspect or tweak the generated code, I could pipe the script's output to a file before compiling it:

./gen-syslog-tests.lua > syslog-tests.c
gcc -o syslog-tests syslog-tests.c

But if I just wanted the compiled binary and had no need to modify the code, it seems inelegant to write things out to a file. Here's where I learned it's possible for gcc to compile code piped in on STDIN.

./gen-syslog-tests.lua | gcc -o syslog-tests -xc -

The two things of note are: gcc can't deduce the programming language from the file extension (since there is no file) so the -x flag is necessary to identify the language, and - is used as the file name (a convention commonly used to indicate reading from STDIN as a file).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Writing a Minimal PSR-0 Autoloader

An excellent overview of autoloading in PHP and the PSR-0 standard was written by Hari K T over at PHPMaster.com , and it's definitely worth the read. But maybe you don't like some of the bloated, heavier autoloader offerings provided by various PHP frameworks, or maybe you just like to roll your own solutions. Is it possible to roll your own minimal loader and still be compliant? First, let's look at what PSR-0 mandates, taken directly from the standards document on GitHub : A fully-qualified namespace and class must have the following structure \<Vendor Name>\(<Namespace>\)*<Class Name> Each namespace must have a top-level namespace ("Vendor Name"). Each namespace can have as many sub-namespaces as it wishes. Each namespace separator is converted to a DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR when loading from the file system. Each "_" character in the CLASS NAME is converted to a DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR . The "_" character has no special ...

What's Wrong with OOP

Proponents of Object Oriented Programming feel the paradigm yields code that is better organized, easier to understand and maintain, and reusable. They view procedural programming code as unwieldy spaghetti and embrace OO-centric design patterns as the "right way" to do things. They argue objects are easier to grasp because they model how we view the world. If the popularity of languages like Java and C# is any indication, they may be right. But after almost 20 years of OOP in the mainstream, there's still a large portion of programmers who resist it. If objects truly model the way people think of things in the real world, then why do people have a hard time understanding and working in OOP? I suspect the problem might be the focus on objects instead of actions. If I may quote from Steve Yegge's Execution in the Kingdom of Nouns : Verbs in Javaland are responsible for all the work, but as they are held in contempt by all, no Verb is ever permitted to wander about ...

Learning Prolog

I'm not quite sure exactly I was searching for, but somehow I serendipitously stumbled upon the site learnprolognow.org a few months ago. It's the home for an introductory Prolog programming course. Logic programming offers an interesting way to think about your problems; I've been doing so much procedural and object-oriented programming in the past decade that it really took effort to think at a higher level! I found the most interesting features to be definite clause grammars (DCG), and unification. Difference lists are very powerful and Prolog's DCG syntax makes it easy to work with them. Specifying a grammar such as: s(s(NP,VP)) --> np(NP,X,Y,subject), vp(VP,X,Y). np(np(DET,NBAR,PP),X,Y,_) --> det(DET,X), nbar(NBAR,X,Y), pp(PP). np(np(DET,NBAR),X,Y,_) --> det(DET,X), nbar(NBAR,X,Y). np(np(PRO),X,Y,Z) --> pro(PRO,X,Y,Z). vp(vp(V),X,Y) --> v(V,X,Y). vp(vp(V,NP),X,Y) --> v(V,X,Y), np(NP,_,_,object). nbar(nbar(JP),X,3) --> jp(JP,X). pp(pp(PREP,N...