Skip to main content

Password Woes

Happy belated International Change-Your-Password Week! Earlier this month, thanks to the generous sponsorship by the great folks at Adobe, people all around the world were changing their passwords and tech blogs were parroting guidelines for choosing a strong password. But let’s be honest – passwords are a hassle. And, as Adobe was so kind to remind us, even the strongest unique password can be an open door if the company storing it isn’t doing so competently.

As someone who is a programmer, I’m aware of several technical solutions to our password woes. As someone who suffers from cynical realism, I believe the barrier to adopting these solutions to be red-tape and human nature (ego and laziness). There’s no reason for every website to require their own login credentials when OpenID and OAuth exist. Perhaps we should increase liability for password storers and provide incentives to the crackers who hack them. A smart company would migrate to an SSO-provider to mitigate their responsibility and the provider would be diligent in protecting the hashes.

But as much as anyone would like to mitigate responsibility, the fact remains that it’s the individual who’s most affected by password breeches, not corporations. Are there secure ways to ease the burden of password management?

I’ve been trying out KeePass this past week and my overall impression of the program is fair to middling. I’m storing the encrypted password database to Dropbox for the computers I use the most, and keep a duplicate copy of the database on a thumbdrive with a portable version of KeePass for when I need to use someone else’s computer. Although the premise seems secure, and I trust their implementation to be solid, some of the program’s incidentals frustrate me.

KeePass is fine on Windows but almost unusable on Linux. Unfortunately in this case, a good 90% of my day is spent using Linux. I've also noticed that the Auto-Fill feature toggles back to the most recently used window, so if an IM dialog pops up while I'm toggling to KeePass, the password is leaked. I could spend some time scripting in the advanced sections to safe guard against this, but that seems like a hassle.

I’ve also pondered the idea, so long as it contained accented characters, whether I might be able to get away with using the same password for everything. If the website is using proper encryption practices (Blowfish with scalable cost – i.e. Bcrypt – and random salt) then a rainbow table attack is going to be useless. Those sites that aren't have already proven their incompetence, so they probably don't know how to handle UTF-8 correctly either. The password value would be corrupted, truncated, or filtered, and most likely result in differing hashes between different sites... almost like using the site’s algorithm as your own salt! And brute-force crackers probably aren’t using Esperanto dictionaries; “@D0B3.fuŝ1s!” seems secure, doesn’t it?

Ultimately, programs like KeePass only serve as a bandage and don’t address the core problem, and ubiquitous use of SSO-providers is still a pipe-dream. While we’re all stuck in Password Hell, waiting for the next password-change holiday, the best we can do is keep Clifford Stoll’s advice in mind: “Treat your password like your toothbrush. Don't let anybody else use it, and get a new one every six months.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Geolocation Search

Services that allow users to identify nearby points of interest continue to grow in popularity. I'm sure we're all familiar with social websites that let you search for the profiles of people near a postal code, or mobile applications that use geolocation to identify Thai restaurants within walking distance. It's surprisingly simple to implement such functionality, and in this post I will discuss how to do so.

The first step is to obtain the latitude and longitude coordinates of any locations you want to make searchable. In the restaurant scenario, you'd want the latitude and longitude of each eatery. In the social website scenario, you'd want to obtain a list of postal codes with their centroid latitude and longitude.

In general, postal code-based geolocation is a bad idea; their boundaries rarely form simple polygons, the area they cover vary in size, and are subject to change based on the whims of the postal service. But many times we find ourselves stuck on a c…

Composing Music with PHP

I’m not an expert on probability theory, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. And even my Music 201 class from years ago has been long forgotten. But if you’ll indulge me for the next 10 minutes, I think you’ll find that even just a little knowledge can yield impressive results if creatively woven together. I’d like to share with you how to teach PHP to compose music. Here’s an example: You’re looking at a melody generated by PHP. It’s not the most memorable, but it’s not unpleasant either. And surprisingly, the code to generate such sequences is rather brief. So what’s going on? The script calculates a probability map of melodic intervals and applies a Markov process to generate a new sequence. In friendlier terms, musical data is analyzed by a script to learn which intervals make up pleasing melodies. It then creates a new composition by selecting pitches based on the possibilities it’s observed. . Standing on ShouldersComposition doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Bach was f…

Reading Unicode (UTF-8) in C

In working on scanner code for Kiwi I did a bit of reading up on Unicode. It's not really as difficult as one might think parsing UTF-8 character by character in C. In the end I opted to use ICU so I could take advantage of its character class functions instead of rolling my own, but the by-hand method I thought was still worth sharing. Functions like getc() read in a byte from an input stream. ASCII was the predominant encoding scheme and encoded characters in 7-8 bits, so reading a byte was effectively the same as reading a character. But you can only represent 255 characters using 8 bits, far too little to represent all the characters of the world's languages. The most common Unicode scheme is UTF-8, is a multi-byte encoding scheme capable of representing over 2 million characters using 4 bytes or less. The 128 characters of 7-bit ASCII encoding scheme are encoded the same, the most-significant bit is always 0. Other characters can be encoded as multiple bytes but the mo…